Sunday, March 9 2014 8:35 PM EDT2014-03-10 00:35:58 GMT
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) --- Louisville head football coach Bobby Petrino held a news conference before the Louisville-UConn men's basketball game Saturday to preview the start of spring football. The CardinalsMore >>
Petrino talked quarterback competition and the arrest of an incoming freshman, among other topics...More >>
Follow the WDRB Newsroom, Reporters and Anchors.More >>
Tweets from the WDRB Newsroom, Reporters and Anchors.More >>
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) – A group opposing the Ohio River Bridges Project plans to appeal a federal judge's ruling that dismissed a lawsuit over the $2.6 billion construction venture between Kentucky and Indiana.
The Louisville-based Coalition for the Advancement of Regional Transportation, which advocates for public transit and other alternatives to automobile use, filed the notice of appeal Sept. 13 with the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The coalition, or CART, argues in court documents that U.S. District Judge John G. Heyburn II erred by not considering evidence related to changing traffic demand over the past decade and socio-economic impacts from the project, which calls for new spans across the river and a reconfigured interchange where interstates 64, 65 and 71 converge near downtown Louisville.
In addition, CART alleges that the project's purpose and need was "vague and overbroad and used to ratify pre-selected political decisions rather being a product of agency expertise and was not due deferential judicial review. Reasonable alternatives for geographically distant locations were not sufficiently analyzed or were arbitrarily discarded."
Other issues raised in CART's appeal statement include the states' failure to take a "hard look" at runoff from de-icing chemicals and water quality and the addition of "disproportionate tolls" on poor and minority residents in violation of the U.S. Civil Rights Act.
In July, Heyburn ruled that the states and federal government "reasonably exercised their discretion" when making decisions about the project, including its scope and financing, and rebutted CART's claims.
Two other defendants – Louisville's River Fields and the National Trust for Historic Preservation in Washington, D.C. – brought the lawsuit in 2009 and settled their portions of it last January.
CART promotes "environmentally sustainable, socially just, multi-modal transportation that provides affordable access and regional connections to all race and income groups," according to its website.
Kentucky "will respond in court at the appropriate time," said Chuck Wolfe, spokesman for the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
Will Wingfield, spokesman for the Indiana Department of Transportation, said: "We respect Judge Heyburn's opinion and the judicial process. As such, INDOT will not comment on any potential appeal."
Wednesday, February 19 2014 8:10 AM EST2014-02-19 13:10:54 GMT
FRANKFORT, Ky. (WDRB) – A bill that would give state oversight to the proposed Bluegrass Pipeline heads before a House committee on Wednesday. Oil and gas pipelines would need approval from the Kentucky PublicMore >>
Measure would add Public Service Commission oversight to condemnation process for oil and gas pipelines in Kentucky.More >>
Friday, February 14 2014 5:04 PM EST2014-02-14 22:04:35 GMT
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) – The pipeline explosion that rocked rural Adair County early Thursday is the first "significant incident" involving a gas transmission line in Kentucky since 2012, according toMore >>
Columbia Gulf Transmission had highest level of proposed fines from 2006-11, according to analysis; explosion is Kentucky's first "significant" pipeline incident in two years, federal records show.More >>