LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) – Attorneys for Brooks Houck are asking the Kentucky Court of Appeals to review a lower court’s ruling keeping Houck’s bond at $10 million while he awaits trial for the murder of his former girlfriend, Crystal Rogers.

The appeal, filed in Nelson Circuit Court Tuesday morning, comes one day after Nelson County Circuit Court Judge Charles Simms III denied a request by Houck's attorneys to lower the bond to $500,000 with GPS monitoring.

Attorneys can file additional briefs with the appeals court and include arguments made in front of Simms. It is unclear how long a ruling would take, but likely to be in the next month or two. 

In his order denying the bond reduction, Simms expressed concern for the safety of other people involved in the case, if Houck is able to post a reduced bond and be released on home incarceration.

"There is reason to believe that the Commonwealth may have one or more cooperating witnesses, and this Court is gravely concerned for the safety of any such witness(es) and any other individuals connected to this case," Simms wrote.

In the eight years since Rogers' disappearance, police have long said Houck was the lone suspect. Last month, he was arrested and charged with murder.

In his ruling Monday, Simms also referenced accusations that Houck's family members — including Nick Houck, his mother and sister — secretly recorded grand jury proceedings, which are supposed to be secret, when they were testifying shortly after Rogers' disappearance.

"... The integrity of the entire proceeding is at stake when someone deliberately violates the rules of criminal procedure," Simms wrote. "In this case, the Houck family intentionally engaged in misconduct when they secretly recorded the grand jury proceeding."

During Houck's initial hearing Oct. 5, prosecutor Shane Young told the court that the investigation into the murder of Rogers is also an investigation into the death of her father, Tommy Ballard.

Less than 18 months after Rogers went missing, Ballard was shot and killed in November 2016 while hunting with his grandson on family property in Nelson County. The case has also long gone unsolved, but Young argued there is a link between the Houck family and Ballard's death.

He told Simms that, during the state's investigation, a rifle was purchased from Nick Houck, Brooks' brother, who was using a fake name. Young said it's the same caliber as the gun used in Ballard's death and so far matches four of the five criteria they were looking at in comparison.

Simms used that information in Monday's ruling, openly wondering what the Houck family has done and what it could do again.

"Although the defense contends that Brooks is not responsible for Nick's behavior, it is apparent that Nick has provided ongoing assistance to his brother," Simms wrote. "... Although this court will not speculate about a motive for killing Tommy, it is extremely alarming as to why Nick may have been selling the same caliber firearm that matches four of the five criteria for being used in Tommy's shooting."

Brian Butler, Houck's attorney, argued in a motion filed in Nelson Circuit Court that the current bond amount is "excessive, punitive, and serves no purpose other than to punish Mr. Houck by keeping him incarcerated while this is pending."

Butler had contended that the $10 million bail is contrary to the constitution and Kentucky legal precedent, arguing bond is not supposed to be used as a punishment but a way to protect people from those deemed dangerous and guarantee defendants show up for court.

He noted that Houck has cooperated with investigators since his former girlfriend disappeared, agreed to interviews with police and submitted to a polygraph examination. The polygraph was deemed inconclusive but "did not show deception" when Houck denied wrongdoing relating to Rogers' disappearance, according to the motion.

Houck has no criminal history, runs a successful local business, has family members in Nelson County, has consistently maintained his innocence and poses a low flight risk, according Butler's motion.

"The current bond is unconstitutional, and, if it stands, can only send a clear message that our laws and years of precedent can be disregarded if the defendant is sufficiently vilified before ever being charged," Butler wrote in the motion.

This story may be updated.

Related Stories:

Copyright 2023 WDRB Media. All Rights Reserved.